Hien Phan Logo
Published on

Why My Ugly MVP Worked Better Than My Perfect One

4 min read
Authors

Table of Contents

Let me tell you about the ugliest thing I’ve ever shipped.

It was a screenshot of my first truly functional, yet undeniably hideous, Minimum Viable Product (MVP). My internal monologue was screaming at me to polish it, to make it look decent, to at least hide the glaringly obvious placeholder text. But I pushed the button anyway.

Screenshot of a very basic, unstyled web application interface.

This was a huge mental hurdle for me. I'd spent months on side projects before, meticulously crafting every pixel, agonizing over the perfect UI, only to have them fizzle out because they never actually launched.

They were beautiful corpses. This ugly thing, but, was alive.

And it was about to teach me a crucial lesson.

The 'Ugly MVP' Philosophy: What Does 'Good Enough' Actually Mean?

My previous approach was to build what I thought people wanted, with all the bells and whistles. This often meant months of work before anyone outside my head even saw it.

The result? Either a product no one needed, or a product that was so complex it was hard to iterate on.

The 'Ugly MVP' philosophy flips this. It's about stripping away everything non-essential to get to the core problem-solving functionality as quickly as humanly possible. It’s not about being lazy; it’s about being strategic.

Here’s my personal 'Ugly MVP' checklist:

  • Core Functionality Only: Does it solve the one primary problem for your target user? If not, cut it.
  • Minimal UI/UX: Does it work? Aesthetics are secondary.

Think functional over beautiful. Placeholder text is fine if it conveys the intended information.

  • No Unnecessary Features: Forget integrations, fancy dashboards, or complex user roles for V1. If it doesn't directly serve the core function, it’s out.
  • Speed Over Perfection: The goal is to ship fast. If you can build it in a day or two, do it. If it takes a week, question why.
  • Embrace Imperfection: This is the hardest part. You will cringe.

Your friends might laugh. That’s the point.

It means you’re prioritizing learning over vanity.

The psychological shift is massive. Instead of aiming for a polished gem, you’re aiming for a functional tool. This allows you to get it into the hands of real users, gather feedback, and iterate based on actual demand, not your educated guesses.

A simple checklist graphic with items like 'Core Functionality', 'Minimal UI', 'No Unnecessary Features', 'Ship Fast', 'Embrace Imperfection'.

Why My Ugly MVP Actually Won

My first truly ugly MVP was for a simple content summarizer tool. It looked like it was built in 1998.

The input box was just a plain textarea, the output was basic markdown, and there was zero styling. It was, frankly, embarrassing.

But I shipped it. I shared it on a few relevant subreddits and with my small email list.

And people used it. More importantly, they gave me feedback: "Could you add bullet points?" "Can it handle PDFs?" "What about summarizing articles from specific websites?"

This feedback was gold. It told me exactly what features to build next, based on actual user needs. My previous polished projects never got this level of direct, actionable feedback because they were never truly "shipped" to a real audience.

Compare this to a previous project, a polished SaaS tool for managing personal finances. I spent months on it, building bank integrations, beautiful charts, and a slick onboarding flow.

I launched it to crickets. The integrations were buggy, the UI was complex, and ultimately, people didn't need another budgeting app with all the features I thought they needed.

A graphic showing a timeline with 'Ugly MVP' shipping early and getting feedback, leading to faster iteration, contrasted with a 'Polished Project' shipping late with little feedback.

The ugly MVP, despite its appearance, got me to the validation stage months faster. It allowed me to pivot and build what people actually wanted, rather than what I assumed they wanted.

Your Turn: Build Ugly, Ship Fast

If you’re stuck in the perfection loop, I urge you to try the 'Ugly MVP' philosophy.

  1. Identify the absolute core problem your product solves.
  2. Build only that functionality. Strip everything else.
  3. Ship it. Don't wait for it to look good.
  4. Listen to feedback. Iterate based on what users tell you.

This process might feel uncomfortable, but it's the fastest way to learn, validate your ideas, and build products that people actually use and love. Stop polishing ghosts and start building living, breathing (even if ugly) solutions.

Hien Phan

Struggling to turn ideas into profitable products? Building 52 products in 365 days, sharing the real journey from concept to revenue. Weekly insights on product development and solo founder lessons.

📚 Join readers reading 87+ articles on building profitable products

Why My Ugly MVP Worked Better Than My Perfect One | Hien Phan - Solo Developer Building 52 Products in 365 Days